PSIRT watch for FortiGate, FortiManager, FortiOS, and related products.
Watch items
Showing the 20 most recent items, newest first. Each row links to the official advisory.
20 rows · sorted newest first
Operations viewA improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.1, FortiClientEMS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here>
CVSSv3 Score: 7.0 An out of bounds read [CWE-125] vulnerability in FortiAuthenticator may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive information via a specially crafted request. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 7.7 An Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability [CWE-668] in FortiSandbox may allow an unauthenticated attacker to access the VNC server of VMs performing scanning via network requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 5.0 An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitch Manager may allow a privileged authenticated attacker with physical access to the device to delete the file system via crafted CLI commands. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 4.1 A buffer over-read vulnerability [CWE-126] in FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE may allow an authenticated remote attacker to return a portion of device memory in the redirect response via submitting a specially crafted request. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 6.9 An Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints [CWE-923] vulnerability in FortiSIEM Windows Agent may allow an unauthorized attacker on the same local network to execute arbitrary code via spoofing the supervisors hostname when the Windows device is configured with the 'Supers Override' feature. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 6.7 An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClient EMS may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to impersonate an AD Connector via a valid API Key. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 6.1 An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM and FortiSwitch-Manager Agentless SSL-VPN may allow an authenticated remote user to execute code or commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 5.9 A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiOS, FortiProxy and FortiPAM may allow a privileged authenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 5.3 An Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability [CWE-80] in FortiSIEM may allow a privileged administrator to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 3.1 An Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy captive portal may allow an attacker able to intercept and modify a user's authentication request to inject arbitrary headers via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 3.4 An Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy may allow an attacker in possession of a valid web filter override token to inject arbitrary headers via tricking a user into clicking on a crafted link. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests
CVSSv3 Score: 9.1 An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud and FortiSandbox PaaS WEB UI may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 6.0 An Internal Asset Exposed to Unsafe Debug Access Level or State vulnerability [CWE-1244] in FortiOS and FortiProxy may allow an authenticated admin to execute lua scripts via crafted CLI commands. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 6.2 An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiPortal API endpoints may allow a remote privileged attacker with organization user role to obtain sensitive network configuration data via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 7.9 Linux kernel is impacted by CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-43500 which chained together create the Dirty Frag vulnerability.CVE-2026-43284In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags MSG_SPLICE_PAGES can attach pages from a pipe directly to an skb. TCP marks such skbs with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG after skb_splice_from_iter(), so later paths that may modify packet data can first make a private copy. The IPv4/IPv6 datagram append paths did not set this flag when splicing pages into UDP skbs. That leaves an ESP-in-UDP packet made from shared pipe pages looking like an ordinary uncloned nonlinear skb. ESP input then takes the no-COW fast path for uncloned skbs without a frag_list and decrypts in place over data that is not owned privately by the skb. Mark IPv4/IPv6 datagram splice frags with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, matching TCP. Also make ESP input fall back to skb_cow_data() when the flag is present, so ESP does not decrypt externally backed frags in place. Private nonlinear skb frags still use the existing fast path. This intentionally does not change ESP output. In esp_output_head(), the path that appends the ESP trailer to existing skb tailroom without calling skb_cow_data() is not reachable for nonlinear skbs: skb_tailroom() returns zero when skb->data_len is nonzero, while ESP tailen is positive. Thus ESP output will either use the separate destination-frag path or fall back to skb_cow_data().CVE-2026-43500In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present The DATA-packet handler in rxrpc_input_call_event() and the RESPONSE handler in rxrpc_verify_response() copy the skb to a linear one before calling into the security ops only when skb_cloned() is true. An skb that is not cloned but still carries externally-owned paged fragments (e.g. SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG set by splice() into a UDP socket via __ip_append_data, or a chained skb_has_frag_list()) falls through to the in-place decryption path, which binds the frag pages directly into the AEAD/skcipher SGL via skb_to_sgvec(). Extend the gate to also unshare when skb_has_frag_list() or skb_has_shared_frag() is true. This catches the splice-loopback vector and other externally-shared frag sources while preserving the zero-copy fast path for skbs whose frags are kernel-private (e.g. NIC page_pool RX, GRO). The OOM/trace handling already in place is reused. Revised on 2026-06-03 00:00:00
CVSSv3 Score: 7.8 CVE-2026-31431In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly. Revised on 2026-05-13 00:00:00
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests.
CVSSv3 Score: 9.1 An Improper Access Control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiAuthenticator may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-05-12 00:00:00
| Alert | Exposure | Status | Published | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
forticlientems vulnerability (CVE-2026-59836)A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.1, FortiClientEMS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> forticlientems | CRITICALCVE-2026-59836 Elevated | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 11:17 AM | NVDOpen source |
Out of bounds read in GUI (FortiAuthenticator)CVSSv3 Score: 7.0 An out of bounds read [CWE-125] vulnerability in FortiAuthenticator may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive information via a specially crafted request. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiAuthenticator | high Elevated | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Unauthenticated VNC access exposed on all interfaces (FortiSandbox)CVSSv3 Score: 7.7 An Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere vulnerability [CWE-668] in FortiSandbox may allow an unauthenticated attacker to access the VNC server of VMs performing scanning via network requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiSandbox | high Elevated | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Path traversal in CLI command allows deletion of root file system (FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitch Manager)CVSSv3 Score: 5.0 An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitch Manager may allow a privileged authenticated attacker with physical access to the device to delete the file system via crafted CLI commands. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy and FortiSwitch Manager | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Buffer overread in authd and wad daemon (FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE)CVSSv3 Score: 4.1 A buffer over-read vulnerability [CWE-126] in FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE may allow an authenticated remote attacker to return a portion of device memory in the redirect response via submitting a specially crafted request. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSASE | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Supers override fails to properly override supervisor address (FortiSIEM Windows Agent)CVSSv3 Score: 6.9 An Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints [CWE-923] vulnerability in FortiSIEM Windows Agent may allow an unauthorized attacker on the same local network to execute arbitrary code via spoofing the supervisors hostname when the Windows device is configured with the 'Supers Override' feature. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiSIEM Windows Agent | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Missed certificate verification in AD Connector communication with FortiClient EMS (FortiClient EMS)CVSSv3 Score: 6.7 An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiClient EMS may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to impersonate an AD Connector via a valid API Key. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiClient EMS | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
SSL-VPN Reflected XSS (FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM and FortiSwitch-Manager Agentless SSL-VPN)CVSSv3 Score: 6.1 An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM and FortiSwitch-Manager Agentless SSL-VPN may allow an authenticated remote user to execute code or commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM and FortiSwitch-Manager Agentless SSL-VPN | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Stack Buffer Overflow in Log Report (FortiOS, FortiProxy and FortiPAM)CVSSv3 Score: 5.9 A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiOS, FortiProxy and FortiPAM may allow a privileged authenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 FortiOS, FortiProxy and FortiPAM | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Cross-Site Scripting in Domain parameter (a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability [CWE-80] in FortiSIEM)CVSSv3 Score: 5.3 An Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability [CWE-80] in FortiSIEM may allow a privileged administrator to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability [CWE-80] in FortiSIEM | medium Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Header injection in captive portal authentication form (HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy captive portal)CVSSv3 Score: 3.1 An Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy captive portal may allow an attacker able to intercept and modify a user's authentication request to inject arbitrary headers via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy captive portal | low Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Header injection in Web Filter warning page (HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy)CVSSv3 Score: 3.4 An Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy may allow an attacker in possession of a valid web filter override token to inject arbitrary headers via tricking a user into clicking on a crafted link. Revised on 2026-07-14 00:00:00 HTTP Headers ('HTTP Response Splitting') vulnerability [CWE-113] in FortiOS and FortiProxy | low Watch | watch | Jul 14, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
fortisandbox vulnerability (CVE-2026-25089)A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests fortisandbox | CRITICALCVE-2026-25089 Critical | active | Jun 9, 2026, 11:16 AM | CISA KEVOpen source |
Second-Order OS Command Injection via JSON Input on start vnc feature (an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud and FortiSandbox PaaS WEB UI)CVSSv3 Score: 9.1 An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud and FortiSandbox PaaS WEB UI may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00 an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox Cloud and FortiSandbox PaaS WEB UI | critical Elevated | watch | Jun 9, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Restricted CLI escape using Lua (FortiOS and FortiProxy)CVSSv3 Score: 6.0 An Internal Asset Exposed to Unsafe Debug Access Level or State vulnerability [CWE-1244] in FortiOS and FortiProxy may allow an authenticated admin to execute lua scripts via crafted CLI commands. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00 FortiOS and FortiProxy | medium Watch | watch | Jun 9, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Improper access control in API endpoints (FortiPortal API endpoints)CVSSv3 Score: 6.2 An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiPortal API endpoints may allow a remote privileged attacker with organization user role to obtain sensitive network configuration data via crafted HTTP requests. Revised on 2026-06-09 00:00:00 FortiPortal API endpoints | medium Watch | watch | Jun 9, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Linux Kernel vulnerability Dirty FragCVSSv3 Score: 7.9 Linux kernel is impacted by CVE-2026-43284 and CVE-2026-43500 which chained together create the Dirty Frag vulnerability.CVE-2026-43284In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: esp: avoid in-place decrypt on shared skb frags MSG_SPLICE_PAGES can attach pages from a pipe directly to an skb. TCP marks such skbs with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG after skb_splice_from_iter(), so later paths that may modify packet data can first make a private copy. The IPv4/IPv6 datagram append paths did not set this flag when splicing pages into UDP skbs. That leaves an ESP-in-UDP packet made from shared pipe pages looking like an ordinary uncloned nonlinear skb. ESP input then takes the no-COW fast path for uncloned skbs without a frag_list and decrypts in place over data that is not owned privately by the skb. Mark IPv4/IPv6 datagram splice frags with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG, matching TCP. Also make ESP input fall back to skb_cow_data() when the flag is present, so ESP does not decrypt externally backed frags in place. Private nonlinear skb frags still use the existing fast path. This intentionally does not change ESP output. In esp_output_head(), the path that appends the ESP trailer to existing skb tailroom without calling skb_cow_data() is not reachable for nonlinear skbs: skb_tailroom() returns zero when skb->data_len is nonzero, while ESP tailen is positive. Thus ESP output will either use the separate destination-frag path or fall back to skb_cow_data().CVE-2026-43500In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present The DATA-packet handler in rxrpc_input_call_event() and the RESPONSE handler in rxrpc_verify_response() copy the skb to a linear one before calling into the security ops only when skb_cloned() is true. An skb that is not cloned but still carries externally-owned paged fragments (e.g. SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG set by splice() into a UDP socket via __ip_append_data, or a chained skb_has_frag_list()) falls through to the in-place decryption path, which binds the frag pages directly into the AEAD/skcipher SGL via skb_to_sgvec(). Extend the gate to also unshare when skb_has_frag_list() or skb_has_shared_frag() is true. This catches the splice-loopback vector and other externally-shared frag sources while preserving the zero-copy fast path for skbs whose frags are kernel-private (e.g. NIC page_pool RX, GRO). The OOM/trace handling already in place is reused. Revised on 2026-06-03 00:00:00 | highCVE-2026-43284 High | watch | Jun 3, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Linux Kernel Vulnerability copy.fail - CVE-2026-31431CVSSv3 Score: 7.8 CVE-2026-31431In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly. Revised on 2026-05-13 00:00:00 | highCVE-2026-31431 High | watch | May 13, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
fortindr vulnerability (CVE-2026-25088)An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiNDR 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiNDR 7.2 all versions, FortiNDR 7.1 all versions, FortiNDR 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. fortindr | HIGHCVE-2026-25088 Watch | watch | May 12, 2026, 1:16 PM | NVDOpen source |
Improper access control on API endpoints (FortiAuthenticator)CVSSv3 Score: 9.1 An Improper Access Control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiAuthenticator may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. Revised on 2026-05-12 00:00:00 FortiAuthenticator | critical Elevated | watch | May 12, 2026, 2:00 AM | Vendor advisoryOpen source |
Vendor watch hub
The Fortinetwatch hub is a vendor-specific view inside ITECS MSP Threat Radar. We pull the latest security advisories, incidents, and known-exploited CVEs directly from the official feeds below, score each one for MSP relevance, and surface what's most likely to need attention this week.
At a glance
Tracked
Active
Featured
Unique CVEs
Most recent entry
Jul 14, 2026, 11:17 AM
Feed refreshes daily · 5:15 a.m. Central
Sources·Fortinet PSIRT RSS, CISA KEV, and NVD
"Most recent entry" is the newest item the upstream feed has published — not our sync time.
ITECS response pathways
These pathways connect the vendor watch feed into service-owner resources that already carry commercial authority.
Use the managed firewall services pathway when this vendor alert needs an ITECS-managed response plan.
Connect the vendor watch page to broader managed detection, response, and governance planning.
Translate current watch items into a faster risk snapshot and prioritized remediation plan.
Return to the hub for cross-vendor prioritization, live filtering, and broader MSP threat context.
Vendor watch FAQ
It is the Fortinet-specific view inside ITECS Threat Radar, built to track recent advisories, incidents, and watch items that may affect Dallas-area business operations.
Use it to confirm whether current Fortinet issues overlap with your environment, prioritize remediation, and decide whether you need an assessment, managed security follow-through, or vendor-specific hardening work.
Yes. ITECS can help map Fortinet advisories against your systems, validate affected services, prioritize remediation, and connect the issue to broader managed cybersecurity or managed IT workflows.